Research Governance

Research Protocol

A structured plan that defines how a research or evaluation study will be conducted, documented, and governed.

Concept facts

A research protocol is a structured plan that describes the purpose, participants, procedures, materials, data handling, ethics, and analysis approach for a study.

Also known as
Study protocol, research plan, evaluation protocol, fieldwork protocol
Used in
UX research, usability testing, interviews, field studies, surveys, accessibility research, institutional research governance
Interpret with
Research objective, method, participant criteria, consent, session procedure, materials, risk, data protection, and analysis plan

Plain-language explanation

A research protocol explains how a study will be carried out. It helps ensure that the research is planned, consistent, ethical, and reviewable.

For UX work, a protocol may include the research questions, participant criteria, recruitment process, consent script, task list, interview guide, data collection plan, note-taking approach, recording rules, and analysis plan.

A protocol does not need to be overly bureaucratic, but it should be clear enough that the team knows what will happen and why.

Why it matters

Without a protocol, research can become inconsistent, reactive, or difficult to evaluate. Different moderators may ask different questions, participants may receive different instructions, or data may be collected without a clear analysis plan.

A protocol also protects participants and the organization. It makes consent, privacy, risk, and data handling visible before the study begins.

In institutional work, a research protocol helps align team members, clients, reviewers, and stakeholders around the purpose and limits of the study.

Use contexts

  • Usability testing
  • User interviews
  • Field studies
  • Diary studies
  • Surveys
  • Accessibility testing
  • Institutional research and evaluation

Application guidance

A research protocol should include the research purpose, study questions, method, participant criteria, recruitment approach, consent process, session flow, data collection materials, data handling plan, and analysis approach.

Keep the protocol proportional to the study. A short usability test may need a concise protocol. A sensitive field study may need a more detailed one.

Review the protocol before data collection starts. If the protocol changes during fieldwork, document what changed and why.

Practical example

A consulting team is evaluating a core banking onboarding workflow involving KYC verification, account approval, branch staff review, and customer notification.

Without a research protocol, one moderator may help participants interpret compliance terms while another may stay silent, making findings difficult to compare. A protocol defines the study objective, participant groups, session flow, consent procedure, help rules, task success criteria, recording approach, and data-handling plan before testing begins.

Interpretive boundaries

  • A protocol is not the same as a moderation guide.
  • A protocol should guide the study, not rigidly suppress appropriate field judgment.
  • A protocol cannot fix a poorly chosen method or sample.
  • Sensitive studies may require stronger ethics and risk procedures.
  • Protocol changes should be documented.

Applied at Userhub

Research protocols are relevant when Userhub plans UX research, usability testing, service evaluation, accessibility testing, and institutional fieldwork requiring consistency and ethical clarity.

See Userhub UX Lab for applied UX research and evaluation context.

Sources and references

  • ISO. (2019). Ergonomics of human-system interaction — Part 210: Human-centred design for interactive systems (ISO Standard No. 9241-210:2019). International Organization for Standardization.
  • Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  • Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
  • National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. (1979). The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research. U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.

—

Cite this entry

APA

Userhub. (2026). Research Protocol. UX Reference. https://userhub.com.bd/reference/research-protocol/