Diagnose an existing product
Product UX Evaluation
Used to identify usability barriers, interaction gaps, and improvement opportunities across live platforms.
View evaluation route →UX Lab Operating Model
A structured way of scoping, delivering, and governing UX Lab work so organizations can evaluate digital products with clearer decisions and lower risk.
Overview
UX Lab engagements begin by clarifying the decision an organization needs to make, the risks that need to be reduced, and the type of evidence required to support action.
Operating principle
Work is scoped around real product, service, and organizational decisions rather than methods alone.
What this helps prevent
What this is designed to produce
If your organization uses an existing Theory of Change, donor evaluation model, or internal research standard, UX Lab can map the work to that structure. The model below explains UX Lab’s default operating logic, not a framework clients are required to adopt.
Route selection
Not every product or service problem requires the same kind of work. UX Lab routes projects according to the decision that needs support.
Diagnose an existing product
Used to identify usability barriers, interaction gaps, and improvement opportunities across live platforms.
View evaluation route →Validate tasks with users
Used when teams need to observe whether target users can complete important tasks and where interaction breaks down.
View validation route →Understand context
Used when adoption, trust, or service use depends on deeper behavioral, environmental, or institutional realities.
View research route →Decide what happens next
Used to clarify priorities, align stakeholders, and define the next improvement path when direction is uncertain.
View advisory route →When the route is not obvious
Some organizations begin with a request even when they are unsure which route fits. In those cases, UX Lab first clarifies the decision context and then recommends the most appropriate engagement path.
Process
Methods and outputs differ by route, but the engagement logic remains consistent across UX Lab work.
Identify what the organization needs to decide, what risks matter, and which users, systems, or services are in scope.
Choose the engagement type that best fits the problem: evaluation, validation, advisory, or human-centered research.
Carry out the agreed activities using methods suited to the context, including Bangla-first moderation when that improves comprehension and validity.
Translate evidence into prioritized issues, barriers, risks, or improvement opportunities that stakeholders can review and act on.
Deliver outputs that guide redesign, implementation, validation, or strategic alignment rather than ending with findings alone.
Engagement logic
The operating model remains stable even when methods, delivery rhythm, stakeholders, and reporting formats vary by engagement.
Outputs
Outputs differ by route, but the operating principle stays consistent: evidence should support prioritization, implementation, and clearer decisions.
Make visible what is happening, where the barriers lie, and what the evidence indicates.
Establish which issues, flows, or decisions should come first and why.
Provide outputs that product, program, and delivery teams can use in implementation.
Typical output forms
Governance
Governance supports trust in the work, especially where services involve non-public systems, sensitive behavior, or regulated contexts.
FAQ
Short answers for teams evaluating how the operating model relates to the service pages and request flow.
Request
Share your product or service context, the decision you need to support, your users, constraints, and timeline. We respond with a recommended route and next steps.
This route is designed for teams that may already know the problem, or may only know that the current situation is unclear. In both cases, the request helps establish the most useful next step.