<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-10-31T10:47:24Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" metadataPrefix="oai_dc" identifier="oai:userhub.com.bd:12425">https://userhub.com.bd/oai-pmh/</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:userhub.com.bd:12425</identifier><datestamp>2025-06-21</datestamp></header><metadata><oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd">
  <dc:title>LLM Chatbots in Academic Writing: Usability and Ethical Concerns Among Bangladeshi University Students</dc:title>
  <dc:creator>Wahid bin Ahsan</dc:creator>
  <dc:creator>Fariha Islam</dc:creator>
  <dc:subject>Academic Writing</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>AI Ethics</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>AI Literacy</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>bangladesh</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>ChatGPT</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Digital Divide</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>educational technology</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Featured</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Gemini</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Global South</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>higher education</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>Human-computer Interaction</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>LLM Chatbots</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>qualitative research</dc:subject>
  <dc:subject>usability</dc:subject>
  <dc:description>The rise of large language model (LLM) chatbots, such as ChatGPT and Gemini, is transforming academic writing support in resource-constrained higher education systems like Bangladesh’s. This qualitative study explores how 12 Bangladeshi university students experienced and evaluated the usability and ethical implications of these tools during a structured academic writing task. Using moderated one-on-one sessions, think-aloud protocols, and Bangla-language interviews, the analysis identified ChatGPT’s intuitive interface, mobile accessibility, and time efficiency as key strengths. However, participants faced challenges with prompt formulation, repetitive outputs, and Gemini’s less intuitive, search-oriented design. While both tools aided ideation and drafting, concerns emerged about fabricated citations, over-reliance, and diminished critical thinking, raising academic integrity issues. These findings highlight the need for context-sensitive AI literacy, clear institutional policies, and user-centered, transparent HCI design. The study offers a comparative perspective from a Global South context, characterized by limited digital resources and evolving AI adoption, contributing actionable insights for policy, pedagogy, and design.</dc:description>
  <dc:publisher>Userhub</dc:publisher>
  <dc:source>Userhub Journal</dc:source>
  <dc:date>2025-06-21</dc:date>
  <dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
  <dc:format>application/pdf</dc:format>
  <dc:identifier>https://doi.org/10.58947/journal.mqzd67</dc:identifier>
  <dc:identifier>https://userhub.com.bd/publications/llm-chatbots-academic-writing-bangladesh-usability/</dc:identifier>
  <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
  <dc:rights>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</dc:rights>
  <dc:relation>https://userhub.com.bd/download/report/llm-chatbots-in-academic-writing-usability-and-ethical-concerns-among-bangladeshi-university-students.pdf</dc:relation>
  <dc:language>en</dc:language>
</oai_dc:dc></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>